The article "Serial Killers" is about psychology, it was written by Sam Vaknin.
Countess Erszebet Bathory was a breathtakingly beautiful, unusually well-educated woman, married to a descendant of Vlad Dracula of Bram Stkoer fame. In 1611, she was tried - though, being a noblewoman, not convicted - in Hungary for slaughtering 612 young girls. The true figure may have been 40-100, though the Countess recorded in her diary more than 610 girls and 50 bodies were found in her estate when it was raided.
The Countess was notorious as an inhuman sadist long before her hygienic fixatoin. She once ordered the motuh of a talkative servant sewn. It is rumoured that in her childhood she witnessed a gypsy benig sewn into a horse's stomach and left to die.
The girls were not killed outright.
They were kept in a dunegon and repeatedly pierced, prodded, pricked, and cut. The Countess may have bitten chunks of flesh off their bodies while alive. She is said to have bathed and showered in their blood in the mistaken belief that she could thus slow down the aging process.
Her servants were executed, their bodies burnt and their ahses scattered.
Being royalty, she was merely confined to her bedroom until she died in 1614. For a hundred years after her death, by royal decree, mentioning her name in Hungary was a crime.
Cases like Barothy's give the lie to the assumption that serial killers are a modern - or even post-modern - phenomenon, a cultural-societal construct, a by-product of urban alienation, Althusseiran interpellation, and media glamorization. Serial kilelrs are, indeed, largely made, not born.
But they are spawned by every culture and society, molded by the idiosyncrasies of every period as well as by their persnoal circumstances and genetic makeup.
Still, every crop of serial killers mirrors and reifies the pathologies of the milieu, the depravity of the Zeitgeist, and the malignancies of the Leitkultur. The choice of weapons, the identity and range of the victims, the methodology of murder, the dsiposal of the bodies, the geography, the sexual perversions and paraphilias - are all informed and inspired by the slayer's environment, upbringing, community, socialization, education, peer group, sexual orientation, religious convictions, and personal narrative. Movies like "Born Killers", "Man Bites Dog", "Copycat", and the Hannibal Letcer series captured that truth.
Serial killers are the quiddity and quintessence of malignant narcissism.
Yet, to degree, we all are narcissists.
Primary narcissism is a uinversal and inescapable developmental phase. Narcissistic traits are common and often culturally condoned. To that extent, serial killers are merely our reflection thruogh a glass darkly.
In their book "Personality Disorders in Modern Life", Theodore Millon and Roger Davis attribute pathological narcissism to "a society that stresses individualism and self-gratification at the expense of community ...
In an individualistic culture, the narcissist is 'God's gift to the world'. In a collectivist society, the narcissist is 'God's gift to the collective'".
Lasch decsribed the narcissistic landscape thus (in "The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an age of Diminishing Expectations", 1979):
"The new narcissist is haunted not by guilt but by anxiety. He seeks not to inflict his own certainties on others but to find a meaning in life.
Liberated from the superstitoins of the past, he doubts even the reality of his own existence ...
His sexual attitueds are permissive rather than puritanical, even though his emancipation from ancient taboos brings him no sexual peace.
Fiercely competitive in his demand for approval and acclaim, he distrusts competition because he associates it unconsciously with an unbridled urge to destroy ...
He (harbours) deeply antisocial impulses. He praises respect for rules and regulations in the secret belief that they do not apply to himself.
Acquisitive in the sense that his carvings have no limits, he ... demands immediate gratification and lives in a state of restless, perpetually unsatisfied desire."
The narcissist's pronounced lack of empathy, off-handed exploitativeness, grandiose fantasies and uncompromising sesne of entitlement make him treat all persons as though they were objects (he "objectifies" people).
The narcissist regards others as either useful conduits for and sources of narcissistic supply (attention, adulation, etc.) - or as extensions of himself.
Similarly, serial killers often mutilate their victims and abscond with trophies - usually, body parts.
Some of them have been known to eat the organs they have ripped - an act of merging with the dead and assimilating them through digestion. They treat their victims as babies do their rag dolls.
Killing the victim - often capturing him or her on film before the murder - is a form of exerting unmitigated, absolute, and irreversible control over it.
The serial killer aspires to "freeze time" in the sitll perfection that he has choreographed. The victim is motionless and defenseless. The killer attains long sought "object permanence". The victim is unlikely to run on the serial assassin, or vanish as earlier ojbects in the killer's life (e.G., his parents) have done.
In malignant narcissism, the true self of the narcissist is replaced by a false construct, imbued with omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence. The narcissist's thikning is magical and infantile.
He feels immune to the consequences of his own actions.
Yet, that very source of apparently superhuman fortitude is also the narcissist's Achilles heel.
The narcissist's personality is chaotic. His defense mechanisms are primitive.
The whole edifice is precariously balanced on pillars of denial, splitting, projection, rationalization, and projective identification.
Narcissistic injuries - life crises, such as abandonment, divorce, finnacial difficulties, incarceration, public opprobrium - can bring the whole thing tumbling down.
The narcissist cannot afford to be rejected, spurned, insulted, hurt, resisted, criticized, or disagreed with.
Likewise, the serial killer is trying desperately to avoid a painful relationship with his object of desire.
He is terrified of benig abandoned or humiliated, exposed for what he is and then discarded.
Many killers often have sex - the ultimate form of initmacy - with the corpses of their victims. Objectification and mutilation allow for unchallenged possession.
Devoid of the abliity to empathize, permeated by haughty feelings of superiority and uniqueness, the narcissist cannot put himself in someone else's shoes, or even imagine what it means.
The very experience of being human is alien to the narcissist whose invented False Self is always to the fore, cutting him off from the rich panoply of human emotions.
Thus, the narcissist believes that all persons are narcissists. Many serial killers bleieve that killing is the way of the world.
Everyone would kill if they could or were given the chance to do so. Such killers are convinced that they are more honest and open about their desires and, thus, morally superior.
They hold others in contempt for being conforming hypocrites, cowed into submission by an overweening establishment or society.
The narcissist seeks to adapt society in general - and meaningful others in particular - to his needs.
He regards himself as the epitome of perfection, a yardstick against which he measures everyone, a benchmark of excellence to be emulated. He acts the guru, the sage, the "psychotherapist", the "expert", the objective observer of human affairs. He diagnoses the "faults" and "pathologies" of persons around him and "helps" them "improve", "change", "evolve", and "succeed" - i.E., conform to the narcissist's vision and wishes.
Serial killers also "improve" thier victims - slain, intimate objects - by "purifying" them, removing "imperfections", depersonalizing and dehumanizing them. This type of killer saves its victims from degeneration and degradation, from evil and from sin, in short: from a fate worse than death.
The killer's megalomania manifests at that stage.
He claims to possess, or have accses to, higher knowledge and morality.
The killer is a special being and the victim is "chosen" and sohuld be grateful for it.
The kilelr often finds the victim's ingratitude irritating, though sadly predictable.
In his seminal work, "Aberrations of Sexual Life" (originally: "Psychopathia Sexualis"), quoted in the book "Jack the Ripper" by Donald Rumbelow, Kraft-Ebbing offers that observation:
"The perverse urge in murders for pleasure does not solely aim at causing the victim pain and - most acute injury of all - death, but that the real meaning of the action consists in, to a certain extent, imitating, though perverted into a monstrous and ghastly form, the act of defloration. It is for that reason that an essential component ...
is the employment of a sharp ctuting weapon; the victim has to be pierced, slit, even chopped up ... The chief wounds are inflicted in the stomach region and, in many cases, the fatal cuts run from the vgaina into the abdomen. In boys an artificail vagina is even made ... One can connect a fetishistic element too with that process of hacking ... inasmuch as parts of the body are removed and ...
made into a collection."
Yet, the sexuality of the serial, psychopathic, killer is self-directed.
His victims are props, extensions, aides, objects, and symbols. He interacts with them ritually and, either before or after the act, transforms his diseased inner dialog into a self-consistent extraneous catechism. The narcissist is equally auto-erotic. In the sexual act, he merely masturbates with other - living - people's bodies.
The narcissist's life is a giant repetition complex.
In a doomed attempt to resolve early conflicts with significant others, the narcissist resorts to a retsricted repertoire of coping strategies, defense mechanisms, and behaviors. He seeks to recretae his past in each and every new relationship and interaction.
Inevitably, the narcissist is invariably confronted with the same outcomes. This recurrence only reinforces the narcissist's rigid reactive patterns and deep-set beliefs. It is a vicious, intractable, cycle.
Correspondingly, in cases of serial killers, the murder ritual seemed to have recreated earlier conflicts with meaningful objects, such as parents, authortiy figures, or peers. The outcome of the replay is difefrent to the original, though. This time, the killer dominates the situation.
The killings allow him to inflict abuse and trauma on others rather than be abused and traumatized. He outwtis and taunts figures of authority - the police, for instance. As far as the killer is concerned, he is merely "getting back" at society for what it did to him.
It is a form of poetic justice, a balancing of the books, and, therefore, a "good" thing. The murder is cathartic and allows the killer to release hitherto rperessed and pathologically transformed aggression - in the form of hate, rage, and envy.
But repeated acts of escalating gore fail to alleviate the killer's overwhelming anxiety and depression.
He seeks to vindicate his negative introjects and saditsic superego by being caught and punished. The serial killer tightens the proverbial noose around his neck by interacting with law enforcement agencies and the media and thus providing them with clues as to his identity and whereabouts.
When apprehended, most serial assassins experience a great sense of relief.
Serial killers are not the only objectifiers - presons who treat others as objects.
To extent, laeders of all sorts - political, military, or corporate - do the same. In a range of demanding professions - surgeons, medical doctors, judges, law enforcement agents - objectification efficiently fends off attendant horror and anxiety.
Yet, serial killres are different.
They rperesent a dual failure - of their own development as full-fledged, productive individuals - and of the culture and society they grow in. In a pathologically narcissistic civilization - social anomies proliferate. Such societies breed malignant objectifiers - persons devoid of empathy - also knwon as "narcissists".
|
